The word is out: it’s harder to get a mortgage, maybe impossible. Lenders are clamping down, particularly on financing for foreclosure purchases. Just about everyone says so. Since this is a “fact” why bother to buy real estate when you can't get financing?
Well, maybe not a fact. Maybe tales of mortgage woes are exaggerated. Or, maybe they're not true at all. To illustrate, below are four commonly believed myths about financing (particularly foreclosures) that simply aren't true.
Well, maybe not a fact. Maybe tales of mortgage woes are exaggerated. Or, maybe they're not true at all. To illustrate, below are four commonly believed myths about financing (particularly foreclosures) that simply aren't true.
Myth #1: Most buyers use cash, not financing
The National Association of Realtors reports that existing home sales in July were running at an annualized rate of 4.7 million per year. About 29 percent were all-cash deals, meaning some 3.3 million properties will be financed this year. That's a lot of people who somehow are using the mortgage system.
The National Association of Realtors reports that existing home sales in July were running at an annualized rate of 4.7 million per year. About 29 percent were all-cash deals, meaning some 3.3 million properties will be financed this year. That's a lot of people who somehow are using the mortgage system.
Mortgage bankers are making loans — and big profits when they do. Profits per mortgage in the second quarter reached $575, up from $346 per loan in the first quarter, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
Of course, if mortgage bankers don't make loans they don't collect that $575 per successful borrower, reason enough to encourage all possible applications.
How to find foreclosures with favorable financing.
Myth # 2: Qualifying for a home loan is tougher than ever
There's no doubt that the mortgage application process has changed in the past year. Whether it's gotten “tougher” depends on the comparison being made.
Myth # 2: Qualifying for a home loan is tougher than ever
There's no doubt that the mortgage application process has changed in the past year. Whether it's gotten “tougher” depends on the comparison being made.
If we compare today's underwriting standards with the joyous and carefree period from 2002 through 2006 then yes, you bet loan applications have gotten tougher. However, if we compare today's process with loan requirements in the 1990s; underwriting standards for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) loans; or the loan requirements typically set out by community banks, credit unions or small S&Ls then no, lender demands have been fairly consistent.
So what's happened? Why has lending gone back to the good-old-days of fat loan files and lots of verifications?
So what's happened? Why has lending gone back to the good-old-days of fat loan files and lots of verifications?
Wall Street Reform has given lenders a choice: They can originate option ARMs and allow borrowers to apply for financing with a no-doc loan application — but only if they're willing to set aside 5 percent of the loan amount in a reserve and expose themselves to the possibility of borrower lawsuits. Or, they can make loans without the reserve requirements or liability if they simply originate mortgages within the safe harbor created by the new rules.
Loans within the safe harbor are called “QRMs” or qualified residential mortgages. QRMs include FHA, VA and conventional financing — in other words, sane and safe mortgages without “gotcha” clauses.
The “new” loan standards required under Wall Street Reform are hardly outlandish. For instance:
- The lender must show that the borrower has an ability to repay the loan based on current income.
- The lender must verify borrower income claims with tax returns, W-2s, etc.
- The lender must verify the borrower's employment.
None of this stuff is new to anyone who has applied for a VA or FHA loan. Or, for that matter, borrowers who have insisted on using a fully documented loan application.
Huh? Why would anyone voluntarily want to use a full-docs loan application when you could get a stated-income loan (SIL) with a lot less paperwork and hassle?
The answer is money. As Wharton professor Jack Guttentag explains, a stated-income loan today might require an interest rate that's 4 percent higher than a fully-documented mortgage application. That's a huge additional cost over the life of the loan.
Myth # 3: The typical borrower no longer qualifies for conventional financing
DBRS, a provider of credit rating opinions for financial institutions and other large-scale entities, has produced an interesting chart that compares prime mortgage underwriting standards for 2007 and 2011.
DBRS, a provider of credit rating opinions for financial institutions and other large-scale entities, has produced an interesting chart that compares prime mortgage underwriting standards for 2007 and 2011.
The chart plainly shows, among other things, that credit score requirements have increased while maximum loan amounts have declined. These are good examples to illustrate changes in the lending system — and also that such changes are often irrelevant.
For instance, the basic prime loan credit score has gone from 620 to a range of 680 to 720. But so what — the typical FHA borrower has a 699 credit score and FHA loans are not prime financing. As to maximum loan amounts, they've dropped from $2 million in 2007 to $1 million today. This just doesn't impact a lot of people. The typical buyer paid $174,800 for an existing home in July. Not only is financing readily available, there's a very good reason to finance and refinance today: Money is incredibly cheap. Freddie Mac reports that loan rates for both fixed and adjustable financing have slipped to levels unseen during the past 50 years.
“When you look at the realities of the marketplace it's hard to ignore the growing myths and stories which now surround the lending process,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “How many people have been discouraged from buying or refinancing because of lending rumors and fictions?”
Are opportunities in selected markets and with selected properties being missed because of inflated application worries? Arguably that's often the case because not only are interest rates low, so too are home values. For instance, the Federal Housing Finance Agency — the government body that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — says at the end of the second quarter that home prices were 18.8 percent lower than in April 2007.
Are opportunities in selected markets and with selected properties being missed because of inflated application worries? Arguably that's often the case because not only are interest rates low, so too are home values. For instance, the Federal Housing Finance Agency — the government body that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — says at the end of the second quarter that home prices were 18.8 percent lower than in April 2007.
“Not only are home prices generally stalled in most markets, prices for foreclosures and short-sales are particularly depressed,” said Saccacio. “Our foreclosure sales report for the second quarter showed that foreclosed or bank-owned homes were typically priced 32 percent lower than the average sales price of homes not in foreclosure." Which leads us to our fourth myth.
Myth # 4: Financing is not available for foreclosure properties
Financing a foreclosure purchase at the courthouse steps is famously not available in most states. Typically the winning bidder is required to pay the full amount in cash — often on the spot in the form of cashier’s checks.
Financing a foreclosure purchase at the courthouse steps is famously not available in most states. Typically the winning bidder is required to pay the full amount in cash — often on the spot in the form of cashier’s checks.
But that is not true when it comes to purchases of bank-owned properties (REO) or pre-foreclosure properties (typically short sales), which together account for the vast majority of foreclosure-related sales. REO sales alone accounted for nearly 20 percent of all sales nationwide in the second quarter. Although cash offers are common when it comes to REO sales and short sales, they can also be purchased with conventional financing — and often are.
Veteran real estate investor, author and trainer Andy Heller believes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may have gone a bit too far in restricting investor loans in the past few years, but that doesn’t mean financing is an insurmountable obstacle for investors.
“Many people tend to focus on obstacles when they invest, and one of the biggest obstacles they focus on today is financing. There will always be obstacles and as a seasoned investor I will take today hands down over three or four years ago,” said the 20-year investing veteran, explaining that a few years ago investors were scrapping for meager discounts of 5 to 10 percent because of intense competition from other buyers and investors, driven largely by loose lending standards.
“Without a doubt I would prefer challenging financing conditions and bigger discounts because the discount is your security blanket and your profit.”
Heller said financing options are still available for all different types of investors: newbies with little cash or credit, average investors with some cash and credit, and seasoned investors looking to expand their portfolio beyond the 10-property limit set by Fannie Mae.
“Investors today will need to be a good bit more creative than three years ago. But it is certainly worth it if the end result is significantly greater discounts,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment